Case Studies
Our dedicated team strives to revolutionize water treatment through innovation and sustainable solutions.
Application Briefs:
Town of Amherst
Full-scale system (40,000 GPD) – Sale
Objective – Drainage cleanup reducing >100 ppm iron to <1 ppm
Objective Status – Post-install monitoring
Status – Operating
Elateq System Benefits Detail
- Enclosed System (mostly hidden, noise-free)
- Elateq Energy Savings:
- 70% less use compared to the alternative (Pump & Treat): 40,000 GPD in a shallow well (6 ft) equals 16 kWh/day
- Solar system producing excess power
- Approx. 4.5 kWh/day for 40,000 GPD system
- 125 MWh over 30 year=nearly 100 tons of carbon dioxide eq. (EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator )
Application Briefs: Pepsi
Pilot-scale system (2,500 GPD) – Sale
Objective – Wastewater treatment for potable reuse
Objective Status – Meeting Target Values
Status – Operating
Location: PepsiCo, Kolkata, India
System max capacity: 2500 GPD
Pilot duration: 12-15 months
Start date: April 2024
Application Briefs:
Dairy Farm
Pilot-scale system (600 GPD) – Demo (performed through Digested Organics)
Objective – Wastewater treatment reducing COD from 130 mg/L to <50 mg/L
Objective Status – Meeting the Target Values
Status – Completed
$2M Projected service life savings
(100K gallons per day/medium scale).
|
elateq SOLUTION
|
Alternative: Reverse Osmosis
|
|---|---|
Application Briefs:
Municipal WWT
Pilot-scale system (up to 3,000 GPD) – Demo
Objective – Disinfection, min. 25% N removal
Objective Status – Meeting the Target Values
Status – Completed
Elateq System Benefits Detail:
Elateq vs Advanced Aeration for Nutrients Removal at Municipal Scale – Target Contaminant Removal
Over the service life, Elateq can save $820k.
Using an example of South Hadley WWTP (2.66M GPD), Elateq technology can be used to achieve the requirements for nitrogen (nutrient) load reduction by 25% as required by permitting limits by 2023. Compared to retrofitted advanced aeration as an alternative, CAPEX using Elateq’s technology decreases by 10%, while overall OPEX decreases by 40%, including the electrical costs that decrease up to 85%. However, solely retrofitting advanced aeration will require a disinfection step (addition of sodium hypochlorite), for which WWTP in this case study would use up to US$400k over 20 years. In summary, savings by Elateq technology versus upgrades by retrofitted advanced aeration are: 10% on CAPEX, 40% in OPEX, 85% on energy use, and 50% of total savings over 20 years period, Including savings on disinfection.
|
elateq SOLUTION
|
Alternative: Chlorination & Aeration
|
|---|---|